It feels historically vertiginous to see Socrates weigh in on <artificial> <intelligence> , 2000 years ago. [1]

"And so it is with written words; you might think they spoke as if they had intelligence, but if you question them, wishing to know about their sayings, they always say only one and the same thing"

--

[1] Because words are literally artificial marks on paper, and he's literally [2] questioning their intelligence here.

[2] Except he's not, is he? He's verbally questioning their intelligence, because he's actually opposed to doing anything literally literally. [3]

[3] This is getting me twisted in philosophical knots.