Same here. Moved from Opus to GLM 5.2 to 5.3 and I've been pretty happy with the result. Mainly, it doesn't hallucinate and convince itself of mistake so it's good at retrieving information or asking the user for it. Opus and Fable always state something, then try to "prove" it but end up convincing themselves of the wrong thing. Having subagents for retrieval and validation helped but were not enough.

▲

jan_m_savage 13 hours ago | parent [-]

I can't stand Claude's recent personality. It's snarky, uselessly verbose, and it disagrees all the time.

▲

_blk 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I disagree

Co-Authored By: Haiku 4.5

▲

greenavocado 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It will also fully ignore you if it has the slightest belief (not even a hint) that it knows what you want better than you and just start doing things.

	▲	SpaceNugget 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This is also why I think it's baffling that they switched to auto mode by default. It's becoming harder to use Claude at least to help with improving at coding. If I ask something like: "I'm building a simple X as a learning exercise, I'm writing the code so please only answer the question I'm asking and don't try to solve the problem directly. How does ..." There's a 30% chance it starts reading and writing code immediately and a 20% chance it argues with a "design decision" that will bite me in the non-existent future of my learning exercise. If I ask a follow up question, naively assuming that the context from my original question still stands without repeating, it will almost assuredly start making modifications to my code.