| ▲ | Thinking, Fast and Slow(en.wikipedia.org) | |||||||
| 18 points by vinhnx a day ago | 5 comments | ||||||||
| ▲ | bko 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
My problem with this book is that it relies heavily on priming studies. The idea is that you "primed" them for some set of behaviors. Here's an example of a study that supposedly supports this. Participants held a pen in their mouth in one of two ways: - Between the teeth, without touching the lips. This activates some of the muscles used in smiling. - Between the lips, without using the teeth. This inhibits those smile-related muscles. If you think that's stupid and reading into this is foolish it's because it is. A lot of the arguments in this book are built in a delicate set of assumptions that are supported by equally ridiculous and contrived experiments, many of which cannot be reproduced. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | makeitdouble 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Discussions from 10 years ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12030791 Has anything came back to reestablish this book as worth the read ? | ||||||||
| ▲ | oceanplexian 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Daniel Kahneman is a big EA (Effective Altruism) advocate, aka the cult that all the tech elites such as Sam Altman, Elon Musk are a part of. The book is selling you on a belief system (i.e. System1/System2). Then it uses some cherry picked data to set up a straw man to rationalize his idea of how the mind works. Death in a Shallow Pond is a good rebuttal to this even if it doesn't address the book directly. | ||||||||
| ||||||||