| ▲ | aogaili an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
But what does this has to do with LLM-assisted coding? I wouldn't trust this app even it was manually coded. In fact, given the recent reports, in terms of security, one is better off consulting LLMs on the exposure surfaces. Something a solo developer can now do cheaply but in the past required a lot of specialized knowledge. Sorry I don't understand your argument. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ImPostingOnHN an hour ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> But what does this has to do with LLM-assisted coding? What does "LLM-assisted coding" have to do with the question I answered? Here's that question again: > if the app does work and serves the utility you are after, then why not using it? Note that this question does not contain any reference to "LLMs". Indeed, an LLM-generated product can contain adware, spyware, or trojan horses just like a human-written one. For additional context, this app in question seems to actually contain adware and spyware, and has a closed source codebase, so might contain a trojan horse as well. Those seem like pretty good reasons to not run this totally-vibe-coded software, so I'm sorry, but I don't understand your argument that LLMs make this okay or not okay or whatever. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||