It's not about a winner. This isn't CNN, there's no reason, (if you know better) to use the vibe coded sketchy software like he said. We're better than this. Do you really think popular = automatically better?

> It's not about a winner.

And it is not about being first here. ZuckOff is just a better packaged app, that's why it took off.

> Do you really think popular = automatically better?

If it gets the point effectively across better than the original.

Yes.

It is more supported than something that is OSS that will die in under a year.

There are features that ZuckOff has that are more useful than the suggested one IMO.

For a vibecoded app, it is well packaged with a great name.

That is how you get people to use your app.

popular != better but better == popular

If you see something that is popular but you think it is worse, then your better/worse axis is not aligned with the majority.

For example, X is better than Mastodon because you don't have to pick a server to use.