Remix.run Logo
amelius 5 hours ago

Wouldn't that be covered by fair use?

Nobody who loves Disney songs would listen to them while also hearing police officers shouting, etc.

peri-cl 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> "Wouldn't that be covered by fair use?"

There's no human to appeal to in social media platforms. It's automated, algorithmic enforcement; and when it's wrong (or someone exploits it to be wrong, like this), you're powerless to do anything. It means nothing if you're technically in the legal right: the platforms are risk-averse and don't care about your false positive.

GJim 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> It's automated, algorithmic enforcement; and when it's wrong (or someone exploits it to be wrong, like this), you're powerless to do anything.

Ahem...

In the UK/EU Let me introduce you to article 22 of the GDPR

The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her.

i.e. If subjected to an algorithm making decisions, you have an automatic right of appeal to a _human_.

https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/

You need to adopt a sensible data protection law if you don't want to be exploited.

peri-cl 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

If you look into it more carefully, you'll find this doesn't apply to social media moderation, but only more consequential AI-biased decisions.

(In the excerpt you quoted: "legal effects" / or "significantly affects").

ryandrake 24 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh no! It's against the law. That'll definitely stop companies from doing it with impunity.

simiones 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Theoretically, yes, absolutely. Practically, no, they would be taken down by automatic filters and you'd have to be willing to face Disney's lawyers to try to get them reinstated.

UqWBcuFx6NV4r 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You’re right. Tech companies will surprise us all and suddenly start obeying the DMCA to the letter instead of just taking the shortcut of “rights holders upload content, it’s fingerprinted, user content that matches fingerprint is taken down”. Then, we’ll link arms and sing kumbaya.

0x10ca1h0st 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Just to note, you can keep the data on French servers as they are a Offshore/DMCA Ignore country.

someonebaggy 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You can. YouTube doesn't. Instagram doesn't. Facebook doesn't.

queenkjuul 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Wouldn't that be covered by fair use?

This has never once prevented a DMCA notice from being issued, and I'm sure you can guess how easy it is to get a person at YouTube to review your appeal