The longer people see issues that are not being solved via peaceful means, the more accepting they become of non-peaceful means.

I'm not advocating for those means, but I understand how people are feeling more helpless than ever to just "let the system work it out" when the system appears to be bought and paid for by a small concentration of corporations and people with an increasingly disproportionate share of wealth.

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

-Thomas Jefferson

I personally think the tree of liberty is probably getting pretty thirsty.

I wouldn't see myself as constantly wound up, but I get your angle. I also was at most half serious, alluding to a time not long ago in a country not far away, where this instrument had its moment.

And in retrospect, the French revolution is not considered a dark episode of modern history, on the contrary.

> To these constantly wound-up people, every problem, no matter how big or small, can only be solved by brutal violence and savagery.

well, the idea of democracy was to offer a viable path for people's discontent to be heard and remediated.

Unfortunately in most Western countries, dysfunctionality and corporatism have taken it over, and that is why you're seeing authoritarians on the rise across the world. They paint democracy and "legacy" figures as the scapegoat and themselves (plus handing them allllllll the power) as the only solution - just look at Milei and the chainsaw.

Honestly it sounds like I’m not inviting either of you to a party.

[dead]

Unless you intend to run your inference on a potato battery, you're beholden to AMD/Apple/Nvidia/Intel.

Yes, big tech controls them. Chinese ones will be trained to say certain things about Uyghurs and Taiwan, American ones about communism and Palestine.

...except if it's certified organic open source?