| ▲ | nine_k 2 hours ago |
| The nipples in question are not real but realistic pictures, applied after surgery that removes real nipples. So it's a medical cosmetic tatto, not a bizarre erotic kink. |
|
| ▲ | dTal an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| There is a wide range between "medical procedure" and "bizzare kink". Most of the world can handle a nipple. Hell, babies suck on em. It's disturbing how repressed attitudes are being exported from the US. |
| |
| ▲ | GaryBluto 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | >It's disturbing how repressed attitudes are being exported from the US. Declaring everything you deem negative to be a devilish foreign import will get you nowhere fast. A pastime for those who are drawn more to the act of ascribing blame than solving what they claim to be significant issues. |
|
|
| ▲ | EmbarrassedHelp an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Unfortunately for the tattooist, the UK government considers it "harmful" nudity. I'm not sure why the BBC reporter is ignoring that fact. |
| |
| ▲ | IanCal an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Does it? UK law doesn’t, and the BBC shows pictures of it. | |
| ▲ | KPGv2 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The BBC is a good outlet, but their big blindspot is that it's pro-establishment. Now, when your government isn't a flaming pile of dogshit, this is less egregious of a bias than in the rare contemporary time when your President, say, wants to build monuments to himself and rapes children. It's a whiff, here, for sure. But that's the reason why: the government is Good, and it certainly won't screw up spectacularly. | |
| ▲ | thesmtsolver2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Follow the money |
|
|
| ▲ | throw310822 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| In fact, every nipple on the internet is not real, but just a flat, realistic picture. |