| ▲ | dwedge 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Now, finally, I have an idea. It's gonna take 5000 words to get there, though, so if you don't have that kind of time, skip to the part about registries. This article is full of LLMisms, which is to be expected but maybe it wouldn't be 5000 words and wouldn't need this disclaimer if they wrote it themselves | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bdd8f1df777b 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How is this a LLM output? A LLM can easily write out those 5000 words. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lyjackal 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While I’m usually one to also get annoyed at uncurated slop, this doesn’t strike me in any way as LLM text, and likely something the author meant in earnest. I reads lot of LLM text. What part about it appeared generated to you? From my perspective the piece was well structured, paced and thought through (and yes, a bit long) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mixologic an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The only llmism I sensed is the use of "load bearing". Im usually queasy after reading llm slop, and stop before the end. This didn't have that effect. Maybe the llms are getting better, but either way, this article reads like a real hunan write the whole thing. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | elonfboy 34 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stop whining about it, the constant whining is worse than the LLM prose | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||