Are there really people that can't tell the difference between ELIZA and something that can solve open Millennium Prize Problems in math?

▲

esikich 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, AI threatens the folks who think that knowing how to write JavaScript or C makes them smart and being smart is their entire identity.

	▲	daveguy 12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		LLM chatbots are software designed to manipulate, addict, and mine data. Just like social media before it. But anyone who bothers to read the output in a domain they understand will discover they aren't all that no matter who OpenAI steals research from.

▲

MisterMunchkin 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They had to solve the car wash problem by hardcoding the solution in. The AI equivalent of adding another IF statement.

They had to steal the work of researches solving these open problems and then rewrite their solution. The AI equivalent of fraud.

▲

angoragoats 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Humans solved the open math problems.

▲

jsrozner an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It turns out, oddly enough, that it's possible for it to be both. AI can simultaneously be used to destroy the commons with slop and also make contributions to new math (though isn't the jury still out on whether part of the idea was stolen from human mathematicians?)

	▲	handoflixue 44 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		What does "destroy the commons with slop" have to do with ELIZA comparisons?

▲

joquarky an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Their ego doesn't let them see the difference.

▲

mapontosevenths an hour ago | parent [-]

Or perhaps their wallets. There are a lot of programmers here. Some of them think that AI is the death of their profession, rather than a change in it.

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

	▲	jsrozner an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I, uhm, think this idea would apply in both directions.