| ▲ | chessgecko 4 hours ago |
| I think people might prefer the lower idle power consumption from lpddr over the better bandwidth in hbm in battery powered stuff. That said right now the price is definitely preventing us from finding out. |
|
| ▲ | fooker 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Idle yes, but HBM energy consumption / memory operations seems to be a bit better than DRAM. |
| |
| ▲ | vlovich123 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Only if you’re running at 100%. Consumers generally do not. | | |
| ▲ | monster_truck 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That hasn't been true since early HBM2 days, before the controllers standardized on power/voltage management and did things like leave them in P0 to ship on time | | |
| ▲ | vlovich123 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | LPDDR/DDR/GDDR generally still win over HBM when there’s no data being transferred. HBM is primarily better in watts/byte transferred. Consumer electronics spend most of their time idle. |
|
|
|