| ▲ | daishi55 15 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Yeah you already tried that one. You’re hiding behind implications because your actual argument doesn’t withstand the slightest scrutiny. You have yet to respond to either of the points I made. Zero intellectual conviction or courage! | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rpdillon 13 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Yeah, his posting history isn't promising. He's been doing the "if you think you're as smart as an LLM, you're probably right" argument for a month now. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315846 I don't think you're gonna get much out of going back and forth here. For what it's worth, I disagree with you that they're intelligent, but my conviction is fairly low. I don't understand intelligence as well as I would like, and it could well be that we are on our way. One of my theories is that our brains are made up of several modules, each of which is something like an LLM trained on a particular type of data, but I'm not a neuroscientist, just an interested observer. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||