| ▲ | kloud 8 hours ago | |
Calling open-weights as open-source in marketing materials is the usual misrepresentation. But now with the restriction on commercial use (which is against opensource definition) it is not even open-weights, technically it would be more accurate to call it weights-available. | ||
| ▲ | NewJazz 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |
And the only reason source available had any significance is that you could look at something and understand it. Weights are much much more opaque. It's just freeware. | ||