| ▲ | mitxela 16 hours ago | |
Even the true copyright abolitionists (who want companies like Oracle to be able to fork their software and make a billion dollars releasing the binaries) still use MIT license which requires attribution. | ||
| ▲ | ndriscoll 14 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I'm a copyright abolitionist, but I think Oracle should be required to release the source code with their binaries as a basic consumer protection. I also don't care about attribution. | ||