Remix.run Logo
vrganj 10 hours ago

Yup. All this talk of personal responsibility in these types of situations is nothing but a perfidious form of victim blaming.

"The crack addict should've known better, it's not the dealer's fault they came back for more!"

talon8635 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I actually thinks it’s far more applicable in the crack scenario than the social media scenario. There are lots of people who don’t use crack. The vast majority of humanity.

What percentage of teens don’t use social media? I don’t know the answer, and would adjust my thinking if incorrect, but my assumption is “a small minority”

Personal responsibility IS a factor that can’t be ignored when it comes to addiction. I say this as a multi substance addict who’s been clean for over a decade. Tech is a whole new beast though, because we are often forced to use it. It’s closer to food addiction than crack addiction, which, IMO, is the most brutal addiction of all (food). No one neeeds crack to survive, so stopping it is one thing. Stopping (junk) food addiction, or severe over eating, or whatever you want to call it… man, that must be brutal.

I don’t use social media, but I’m an old fogie. I’d imagine you kids can not very easily “just not use it” if they want to have any semblance of social life and to find a high paying job after college

howunfortunate 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think personal responsibility does play into these situations to some extent, but even so, that doesn't imply there should be zero regulation.

Both for crack addicts and teens using social media, they not only hurt themselves, but also hurt those around them.

The studies on teen mental health largely suggest that mostly it's not about using a lot of social media yourself, but living in an area where social media is the coin of the realm. It's the toxic culture SM generates rather than direct use that's hurting teen mental health.