| ▲ | tikotus 18 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I get kicks out of developing novel solutions to unsolved problems. I might be wrong, but I like to think it's the kind of stuf LLMs are not yet great at. Call me selfish, but I now have absolutely zero interest in sharing my findings with the world because of LLMs, since once I do, LLM companies can start selling my work. LLMs evened the battlefield for all that has been developed so far, but what about future discoveries? I think it remains to be seen if LLMs can come up with these novel solutions rendering innovators useless. If not, then LLMs might be crippled by software becoming more closed in the future. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nayroclade 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Companies could take your discoveries and sell things based on your work before LLMs ever existed. What's changed? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | usewik 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective use of frontier models involves "driving the build". They can't really do it themselves, human is still involved to tie break complicated tradeoffs and take on deployment, security, financial and other risks. The innovators are not becoming useless, they are offered a choice to 10x their output and speed and quality of execution. Execution still matters, it just became different. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||