| |
| ▲ | killerstorm 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | True, but I think in the end people were better off with automation. You know a lot of people were suffering even when they were fully employed. | | |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's the key insight that's missing in most of the automation/employment discussions. Yes, absolutely, in the end people were better off with automation. But these particular people - and their families and children - were not. | | |
| ▲ | senordevnyc 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It seems obvious then that the answer is supporting the much smaller displaced people, not stopping progress for the entire population (and future generations). | |
| ▲ | _DeadFred_ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And we run the risk of fall into that lost generation under AI. But hey, 50 years later things might work out, that is if past performance guarantees future results when it comes to adjusting to employment shocks. |
|
|
|
