| ▲ | Liftyee a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The penalties are interesting. It shows that the design goal is not to maximise interactions otherwise "controversial" posts should stay up. Still though, I wonder what's the point of deranking said posts. Minimise the potential for a flame war to hit critical mass? Stop people from perceiving HN as an argument-filled forum? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | consumer451 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It shows that the design goal is not to maximise interactions otherwise "controversial" posts should stay up. What I believe to be a less human-moderated version of the front page still exists on HN. It is interesting to compare it to the default. Both have their benefits. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Karrot_Kream a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HN is already perceived as an argumentative forum. Now imagine if the ratio rule wasn't there. FWIW I find it just as effective on Bluesky and Twitter for myself. Ratioed threads are usually more heat than light. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | firesteelrain a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Controlled narratives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | doginasuit a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> It shows that the design goal is not to maximise interactions otherwise "controversial" posts should stay up. It seems like there is a direct explanation, HN doesn't show ads. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Barbing a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officially, should be protecting the site by keeping things interesting. (Just saying officially.) Thanks to dang, links: curiosity and repetition: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&so... downweighting follow-ups: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stackghost a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> the design goal is not to maximise interactions The design (not sure about its goal) maximizes incentive for medium-complexity ideas being expressed in comments with at most a handful of replies. The “comments on a submission with ranking based on votes” model is fundamentally unsuited for in-depth, thoughtful discussions. Everything we write in this comment section will be mostly forgotten by tomorrow because there is no notification system for when someone replies to your comments. Zero people are going back through old submissions more than a day or two old and looking for insightful comments to reply to. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||