|
| ▲ | ericmay 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Denmark never denied an approval, so it has no meaningful difference. But Denmark could deny access. Formal agreements are important. You generally don’t leave this stuff up to chance or ambiguity if you don’t have to. > The US has closed the bases because they make no sense with modern military and satellites. I’m confused by this. What good do satellites do? So you can watch an enemy armada sail by? There is more importance especially if/when these northern sea routes begin to have interdiction and further early warning systems available. I think the military knows why it needs this stuff. |
| |
| ▲ | toyg 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I think the military knows why it needs this stuff. You assume this deal was driven by military needs. And we all know what happens when one assumes... I would be ready to bet that, considering how the current administration decapitated the military and installed yes-men at the top, this effort was not, in fact, driven by military needs. | | |
| ▲ | ericmay 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You’re making your own assumptions while accusing me of being beholden to mine. One can simply think about it and understand the military and strategic importance of Greenland and that the US may over time change its defensive posture in the region depending on various goals or situations. |
| |
| ▲ | 3eb7988a1663 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Formal agreements matter unless the counter-party is the US who will gleefully alter the deal the second it becomes inconvenient. | | |
| ▲ | ericmay 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yea totally the US is the only country that has ever disputed anything ever |
| |
| ▲ | 301927-1927 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I think the military knows why it needs this stuff. Watching a scripted Senate Armed Services Committee hearing with Senators and Generals agreeing on every topic that serves the Senators' districts and the generals' post-service Raytheon jobs: Yes, they know exactly what they are doing. |
|
|
| ▲ | nonethewiser 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| >Denmark never denied an approval, so it has no meaningful difference. Sure there is a difference. The old agreement required Danish agreement for new defense areas. They forfeited that control. Its like saying an API requiring authorization is the same as one not requiring authorization if historically there were no unauthorized requests. |
|
| ▲ | jeroenhd 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Denmark never denied an approval Which makes it telling that the USA is seeking the ability to go without approval. Sounds to me like they're planning something outrageous that Denmark wouldn't approve of. |
| |
|
| ▲ | esseph 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > The US has closed the bases because they make no sense with modern military and satellites. They make a ton of sense if you want to control artic shipping and need a somewhat protected staging area from small drones for forward supply areas for Europe, Russia, Africa, and the Middle East. |
