Yeah because... AI is a tool, not an artist. In other words water is wet.

The reason it isn't obvious is because the tool is marketed as replacing the artists, and that's how people are using it.

Also what the author of this post did could easily be added to the training/harness/skills of ChatGPT in a future version.

	▲	MichaelZuo an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Of course they have ulterior motives to push the message that it can replace high quality human artists, even though that would be ridiculous under any serious analysis. That doesnt mean you have to believe them.