Ach, idk. On average people have horrible design aesthetics, yet are now so arrogant about it, because they imagine their a newly found ability to spot design generated with AI equates to them being able to spot bad design.

No, you silly geese. What you are able to spot is somebody using AI poorly. That's not you developing taste. It's the equivalent of being able to tell something is photoshopped because somebody used a default brush poorly, or masked something poorly and then confounding using Photoshop with using Photoshop poorly.

You have absolutely no way of telling when a good designer created something entirely using AI (unless they are fine with you knowing that) and that has always been true.

> they imagine their a newly found ability to spot design generated with AI equates to them being able to spot bad design.

Who is imagining that?

> No, you silly geese. What you are able to spot is somebody using AI poorly. That's not you developing taste.

Again, I'm not really sure that the 'spotting AI' endeavour is always supposed to be a flex of someones own taste.

> You have absolutely no way of telling when a good designer created something entirely using AI (unless they are fine with you knowing that) and that has always been true.

I have trouble parsing your entire comment, but you have lost me completely at 'always been true'. I don't know how many hours your 'good designer' would waste on creating only with AI something able to fool everybody 2 years ago. It would surely be too many to be practical.

This is sometimes called the "Toupee Fallacy": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/toupee_fallacy

I think I'm going to call this "no true slopsman"