>Fielding left-wing candidates with no accomplishments makes Trump happen. It's not that complicated.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and a Senator from New York, while Kamala Harris was a District Attorney and Attorney General, and then Senator for California before serving as Vice President.

Also only in the fetid delirium of Republicans and Trumpists are either of them even remotely left-wing.

▲

matchbok3 12 hours ago | parent [-]

The typical American views a businessman who built (and lied and stole) a company as more experienced than senator who signs mostly bills that rename post offices.

The Democrats continue to insist that this isn't the case. And keep losing.

	▲	krapp 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So the typical American, when selecting for a political job, holds a man with no political experience but who was so corrupt and inept as a businessman he managed to bankrupt a casino in higher esteem than candidates with actual success and experience in the field selected for? Fine. The typical American is an idiot and they get what they deserve, then. >The Democrats continue to insist that this isn't the case. And keep losing. It shouldn't be the case, the Democrats are correct (at least about that, although I suspect they never actually "insisted" on anything of the sort,) Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton were more qualified than Trump and deserved to win, and I hope this whole clownshow of a country burns to the ground. I leave the floor to you, matchbok3. I've exposed myself to Hacker News for too long and I need time in the screaming box.