| ▲ | tzs 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
From the article, starting in the next paragraph after the one your quote was in: > But what is the threat? In 1940 the danger of a German invasion of the UK was very real. But the chances of Russian tanks rolling up Whitehall are surely negligible. > "It's not the tanks you need to worry about," says historian Margaret MacMillan, author of War: How Conflict Shaped Us. > "It's the cutting of cables on the ocean floor. It's the hacking into systems on which so many things depend. The possibility for asymmetric war, for cyber war, is growing by leaps and bounds." | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | keeda 5 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Case in point, Russia has been fought to a standstill by its much smaller neighbor using asymmetric warfare. There is no reason Russia would not turn around and do the same to other countries. One may argue it has already done so in the past via election interference, except now it also has AI in its arsenal, which won’t even need ICBMs to be delivered to its targets. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||