| ▲ | bitcurious 2 hours ago |
| > The newspaper also reported, citing another unidentified official, that not all of the undisclosed deaths were directly tied to the months-long conflict but involved US personnel who were in the Middle East amid ongoing hostilities. If someone dies near a war, but not due to the war, is it really fair to count them as a war fatality? |
|
| ▲ | lukan 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If they are killed by houthi drones and not iranian drones, I would think so. If someone on a military base with no attacks going on, got a heart attack by watching the news, probably not a war fatality. But we don't know, so any concrete speculation is probably not very helpful. |
| |
| ▲ | AnotherGoodName 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | To get more specific this often means 'suicide' which absolutely is a casualty of war given the strain of war conditions, especially given the logistics concerns and duration of tours that they are forcing right now. | | |
| ▲ | mitxela an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Did it end up being true that the troops on that aircraft carrier had to catch rats and cook them to survive? | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz an hour ago | parent [-] | | Are you, uh, mixing up the term "midrats" with something? I've not seen this claim. The fact that they sent it immediately home for a port call (and had SecNavy visit for a pep talk) when the news of conditions on the Lincoln broke is probably indicative. |
| |
| ▲ | Freedom2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | What logistics concerns are there? Isn't the US supposed to be one of the best at managing wartime logistics, which is why they have bases all around the world? | | |
| |
| ▲ | throw0101a an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | > If someone on a military base with no attacks going on, got a heart attack by watching the news, probably not a war fatality. Were they at that base as a (say) mechanic servicing aircraft engines for flights over the Persian Gulf? Are the only reasons why the planes (and thus him) are there is because of the hostilities with Iran, as otherwise they would be States-side? |
|
|
| ▲ | runako 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "With Covid, not of Covid," but for military casualties. One does see something new every day. |
| |
| ▲ | Retric an hour ago | parent [-] | | There’s often more ambiguity than that. “Died of a COVID linked complication with COVID and other issue that is also linked to that complication.” You can’t spend endless resources deciding if something is or isn’t responsible. Systems use arbitrary buckets like if someone commits suicide in less than six months from coming home after a war might count it, while excluding every case after six months. That’s going to misclassify cases in both directions but means you don’t need to track millions of people for decades or look through mental health details. Obviously people with more data to work with can make a convincing case you’re wrong, but higher levels accuracy get expensive. In the end we know more than 1 million Americans died of COVID for example, how many more isn’t precisely known but ~1 million is plenty useful for decision making around the next pandemic. |
|
|
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | lokar 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's routinely written and recounted that for most wars in history more people died from disease than combat. But we still count them all as war deaths. |
|
| ▲ | searealist 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It depends who is president. |