| ▲ | shevy-java 5 hours ago |
| Well, it is time to realise that GPL and similar variants, are better
in the long term. I like MIT too, but GPL worked so much better for the
linux kernel. Google and others abuse the ecosystem of open source
contributors here. |
|
| ▲ | microtonal 5 hours ago | parent [-] |
| You mean the Linux kernel that the GrapheneOS project has to request every update for and then has to wait up to weeks to get a Google Drive link? The GPL is worth nothing if nobody is enforcing it aggressively. |
| |
| ▲ | mitxela 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes, as opposed to the Fuchsia kernel where they wouldn't even get that. We're lucky Google is institutionally incapable of creating things. | |
| ▲ | nomel 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Could you quote the part of the GPL that they're not adhering to (which you seem to be implying), in this situation? | |
| ▲ | dvdkon 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The GPL is the only reason they even get that. More enforcement would certainly be good, but it's not like the GPL is worthless without a legal team backing you up. |
|