Remix.run Logo
Arainach 6 hours ago

It doesn't help that this is being forced from above. I agree you can't turn off your brain, but any time I argue that AI isn't the right tool for something management gets angry. There is a constant push to fully automate things, regardless of what those things are.

Even if I agree that you have to use your brain, when my boss is literally telling me to stop questioning whether AI automation is the right answer in team meetings/chats I'm just going to shut up and give them what they want.

awsglkhj 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Suppose I do something myself. I reap all the benefits, but it takes a lot of time, I may not have the expertise to do a good job, and I get all the blame if something goes wrong. Suppose I go to the park and find one of several guys who would do it for free. I get all the of benefits, he might do an excellent job, but, because there's no contract, I still take all the blame.

Suppose I actually hire a professional to do it. I receive fewer of the benefits. However, he's much more likely to do a good job, and the legal system provides a variety of ways to hold him accountable for the work.

Suppose I hire a professional, but then insist that he use legions of guys from the park to do the actual work, since that's going to be some much faster and cheaper per quantum of work. I also tell him that if he's unwilling to do that, I'll find someone who will. I also tell him that, since he has so much more unoccupied time now that the original work is in the hands of all those other dudes, he gets to supervise still more work done by other swarms of guys from the park.

At this point it should be clear that I'm not interested in quality work, but in having someone poised to absorb blame. I want a patsy.

Now replace "guys at the park" with LLMs, and replace "free" with "nearly free, but with no warranty."

fwlr 4 hours ago | parent [-]

A “moral crumple zone”: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351054898_Moral_Cru...

scrimblo_blimbo 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

They're getting mad because they want you to build your replacement

CaptainTaboo 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My company is doing this, too. It’s the reason I’m submitting my resignation notice next week.

drchickensalad 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I just did. Good luck my brother/sister.

winrid 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Good on you. I absolutely hate reading the output from Opus. It's disrespectful to make people read it, and to share AI output without reading and understanding it first.

eli_gottlieb 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Opus in particular seems to somehow combine pretentious intellectualism with sheer idiocy.

RankingMember 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Even if I agree that you have to use your brain, when my boss is literally telling me to stop questioning whether AI automation is the right answer in team meetings/chats I'm just going to shut up and give them what they want.

Some would tell you that you need to find a different job with a better boss, but I'd say that this is quickly becoming something very hard to escape from. Investors want line to go up, and they all talk to each other about this "AI" thing that lets them cut staff and keep productivity, so naturally we're all getting it crammed down our throats.

runarberg 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Finding a better boss is like picking up the good cop. There are none. The whole industry has gone completely bonkers, and bosses are the ones doing it. The problem is systemic and if there are any good bosses out there, then there are systems in place to ensure that their ideals and behavior are not allowed to stand.

bunderbunder 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yup. This is coming from the top, and it's very much because the AI sales pitch that executives bought into is, "Automation can help you reduce head count."

That means that they really don't care if, right there in the moment, just doing the job is faster and better. What they care about is that the actual work is being done by humans, and that's out of line with their grand vision of getting rid of humans.

localhoster 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Same. My team lead sits near me. He keeps checking if I'm using claude, or when we talk he pushes me to use claude.

It's have gotten to the point that I wanted to work on something manually, so I booked a room in the office. Just to not be at my desk, because I'm afraid my claude usage will be reflected in my performance review.

switchbak 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is BONKERS.

I spend a lot of time encouraging my manager and coworkers to ... write some actual english. To not just point an AI at a PR and call it a day. To actually collaborate before we jump into something - leaning on the knowledge we've built instead of being a cowboy and assuming you know it all (you don't, not yet).

In many ways it feels like we're back in some awful version of 90's based software dev. All these amazing tools have got us stuck deep in the shit swamp again.

Also: I would hate working with your team lead.

localhoster 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Not a big fan of him,but he was a dev before and it was a nightmare working with him as a dev.

dfxm12 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If the only metrics your managers have on your Claude usage is visual inspection/conversational, I think you'll be ok...

localhoster 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't know how they eval me. Maybe they eval usage and maybe they don't. I just know I feel uncomfortable to sit next to him sometimes