Which is basically Wilhoit's Law, an attempt to define conservatism.

edit: For those who don't want to look it up, Wilhoit's law is usually stated like this: "Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

▲

psunavy03 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Life's so much easier when you can just caricature the people you disagree with, innit?

	▲	FLeXMurphy 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		To back up stvltvs, the OP did more or less just use the one-liner as a zinger. "Protects but doesn't bind X, binds but doesn't protect Y" is the caricature, really. I'm sure you can find more floating examples on HN of it because it is a very lazy, midwit flex that signals the in-group the person spends too much time on the internet.
	▲	stvltvs 5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		FWIW I don't agree with Wilhoit, just explaining where the idea came from.