Sympathize with you mate, this article just seems like a poorly researched hit job.

The article is about vibe coding, bend is the main character because it made frontpage.

The author here says as much in the introduction, that it is not about whomever is behind bend, but the larger trend

The author here has also added bend's author's link (in GP) to the original post, they very much do not seem to be doing a "hit job" and their intent is to comment on patterns from vibe coding