> ...on the GitHub page with lost history.

> They just recycled the Bend1 repo for Bend2 even though it's a completely different language.

Why would you kill the source history of Bend1 completely if it has 20K stars? You can only do that if Bend1 has no users at all right?

Does that meant that Bend1 isn't actually successful in its own right but rather only as a marketing project?

I wasn't one of the suspicious people but I am now.

▲

LightMachine 3 hours ago | parent [-]

(author here) Bend1 indeed has no significant active userbase

I don't think that means it was "unsuccessful" in the sense you imply, though, because the project was never meant to be used in production. It was there to display a milestone (running inets on the GPU) and I was very clear it wasn't ready to be used yet. For example, it had only 24-bit integers, a 2 GB memory cap, and other limitations that made it unpractical. I still don't know why it has so many stars. I posted it to hacker news and that just happened. I guess it just went viral without really being ready yet, which got us to where we are now.

Anyway the commit history is back now. I apologize for nuking it

▲

jdiaz97 2 hours ago | parent [-]

totally not sus

	▲	verdverm an hour ago \| parent [-]
		it becomes more sus as the superfans come out the author here is providing commentary on the vibe coding era, bend is just one example of people having ai build things for them they don't understand or haven't researched sufficiently, at least start with a vibe-search skill before the vibe-coding begins Ai is only good at a task when the human driver is good at that task, and this is far more narrow than most realize. Someone who knows how to program will still fail on many programming tasks with agents, the field has far too much for any one person to know.