If you're going to insinuate that the author of Bend2 doesn't understand PLs and formal verification, you should do so with some proof and not a hot take dunk.

I think it's fine to critique the language and the approach without criticizing the author and I hate that this site has become Tech Drama News, like the worst parts of Twitter.

Yes, I didn't realise how much it comes off as a critique of the author personally when I wrote it. I have added a note to that effect to the top of the article.

conversations on this site about formal methods are currently absolute cess pits of dunning kruger and confidently stated yet highly misinformed takes from those with close to little experience in the field.