| ▲ | Gud 6 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Theres a big difference. We have social conventions regulating this. Suddenly, mega corporations were allowed to digest(sometimes by illegally pirating “data”, and sometimes by achieving their training corpus and subsequently destroying the copies) and digest this information in a novel way, without any discussion or law making. You may argue it’s beneficial (it very well could be, I use ChatGPT and Claude all the time), but let’s not pretend it’s the same as learning from your history teacher… | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | CrimsonRain 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
Social conventions are regressive and are followed blindly by luddites. Real progress comes from doing what is right and breaking idiotic conventions. Pirating is fine. Subsequently destroying is bad but it is the result of screeching from people lacking foresight who support the idea of training LLM on book copies is wrong. So now corps found "legal" way to do it by destroying it. Again, idiotic social conventions. Without discussing? Law making? What are you, German? There's a reason EU is shit while USA is center of the progress of the world: laws follow innovation; not the other way around. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||