Remix.run Logo
rottencupcakes 3 hours ago

Singapore has the potential to be the first country to eliminate the private ownership of vehicles.

tristanj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Singapore will not be the first. Albania banned private vehicle ownership for over 40 years until 1991.

eru 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Potential, sure. Is it likely? No. Singapore does pretty well with the CoE system and congestion charge.

And eg cars used for Grab and trucks and busses are also privately owned.

nmfisher 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Bet you they won't, because many (most?) Singaporeans think that owning a car is somehow a life achievement.

ExoticPearTree an hour ago | parent [-]

To add a bit more context: owning a car in Singapore is extremely expensive, basically meaning that if can afford that, “you made it”.

3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
zergrush 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why is this something to be celebrated? Private ownership of land, property too ?

elil17 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Because privately owned vehicles kill literally one million people every year.

eru 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Actually, pretty much all land is owned by the government in Singapore, and leased out for about 30 years for commercial property or up to 99 years for residential property.

evbogue 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Singapore would do better banning cars altogether.

eru 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

We already do something like that: we allow around 1 million cars on the island (with around 6 million people living here). We auction off the rights to operate one of these 1 million cars for ten years at a time (you still need to buy your own car, of course).

Your proposal would be equivalent to dropping that number from 1 million to 0 million.

I think a reduction in the total number of cars is worth debating, but I don't think 0 is the optimal number.

Though I do wish Singapore would take inspiration from Japan, and eliminate street parking; and in general have the government exit the car storage business.

throwaway473825 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn't it better to allow a few luxury cars that are taxed to oblivion? As long as there aren't too many cars, the city can be pleasant, and it's a nice source of revenue.

Gigachad an hour ago | parent [-]

What I have heard of the situation is car infrastructure is disproportionally funded because it's used by the rich and influential. It's a drain on public resources when more is spent building huge highways everywhere that the average person can't afford to use.

zhivota an hour ago | parent [-]

While this is true, it's not as bad as somewhere like the US. Public transit gets a lot of funding there, I think they open something like 10 new MRT stations a year on average in recent years, and buses typically come every 2-8 minutes so you never have to wait long.

jesterson 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They already effectively done that with COE. You essentially own piece of metal, which is only roadworthy if you pay $$$