| ▲ | rottencupcakes 3 hours ago |
| Singapore has the potential to be the first country to eliminate the private ownership of vehicles. |
|
| ▲ | tristanj 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Singapore will not be the first. Albania banned private vehicle ownership for over 40 years until 1991. |
|
| ▲ | eru 34 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Potential, sure. Is it likely? No. Singapore does pretty well with the CoE system and congestion charge. And eg cars used for Grab and trucks and busses are also privately owned. |
|
| ▲ | nmfisher 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Bet you they won't, because many (most?) Singaporeans think that owning a car is somehow a life achievement. |
| |
| ▲ | ExoticPearTree an hour ago | parent [-] | | To add a bit more context: owning a car in Singapore is extremely expensive, basically meaning that if can afford that, “you made it”. |
|
|
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | zergrush 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why is this something to be celebrated? Private ownership of land, property too ? |
| |
| ▲ | elil17 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Because privately owned vehicles kill literally one million people every year. | |
| ▲ | eru 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Actually, pretty much all land is owned by the government in Singapore, and leased out for about 30 years for commercial property or up to 99 years for residential property. |
|
|
| ▲ | evbogue 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Singapore would do better banning cars altogether. |
| |
| ▲ | eru 32 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | We already do something like that: we allow around 1 million cars on the island (with around 6 million people living here). We auction off the rights to operate one of these 1 million cars for ten years at a time (you still need to buy your own car, of course). Your proposal would be equivalent to dropping that number from 1 million to 0 million. I think a reduction in the total number of cars is worth debating, but I don't think 0 is the optimal number. Though I do wish Singapore would take inspiration from Japan, and eliminate street parking; and in general have the government exit the car storage business. | |
| ▲ | throwaway473825 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Isn't it better to allow a few luxury cars that are taxed to oblivion? As long as there aren't too many cars, the city can be pleasant, and it's a nice source of revenue. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad an hour ago | parent [-] | | What I have heard of the situation is car infrastructure is disproportionally funded because it's used by the rich and influential. It's a drain on public resources when more is spent building huge highways everywhere that the average person can't afford to use. | | |
| ▲ | zhivota an hour ago | parent [-] | | While this is true, it's not as bad as somewhere like the US. Public transit gets a lot of funding there, I think they open something like 10 new MRT stations a year on average in recent years, and buses typically come every 2-8 minutes so you never have to wait long. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | jesterson 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They already effectively done that with COE. You essentially own piece of metal, which is only roadworthy if you pay $$$ |