| ▲ | webprofusion 11 hours ago | |
I'm always fuzzy on this, so 116% faster or 16% faster? The benchmarks suggest 16%. | ||
| ▲ | tom_ 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Evergreen: https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/what-we-talk-ab... (Feels like it should probably say "1.16x as fast" or "1.16x the throughput" - or something like that.) | ||
| ▲ | levkk 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
116% would be 2x which will break the laws of physics. 16% is possible if you're not allocating heap memory, which I believe is the main selling point here. | ||