Excessive generative AI output devalues all communication media unfortunately. As a greater and greater portion of text, imagery, audio, and video come to be synthetic, I don't see why anybody would be motivated to do deep reading, or listening, or analysis of said media. It's frightening to think what that might do to our civilization, almost like putting us back into a weird version of the ancient past when nobody was literate, save the priest.

Maybe humans can adapt to care about generated content and treat it with the same emotional weight that human communication has. I don't know if that's good or not.

▲

sixtyj 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There is a recent PISA research that students slowly decline in understanding the long reads.

E.g. in one country, 21% of high school students do not even achieve “sufficient reading literacy”…

So the question should be - what are we going to do with this? LLM can produce texts but we as people will not be able to understand anyway…

About PISA research for example here: https://www.edweek.org/leadership/reading-ability-craters-on...

	▲	watwut 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> LLM can produce texts but we as people will not be able to understand anyway LLM generated text oftentimes just do not have the point to be understood. LLM is training you to NOT read, because trying to do close reading of LLM generated text is usually a mistake. There is no deeper there. Either it was correct on the surface things or it is a gibberish.

▲

Insimwytim 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You can't even watch funny animal compilations anymore!

	▲	jakeinspace 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Probably the worst part