> the interviews

those interviews are opinions not evidence, to my knowledge there was no public statements of anyone directly involved into the target selection process in that case

▲

text0404 a day ago | parent [-]

There doesn't need to be an admission of guilt to determine that the US acted in violation of international law. If you'd like to learn more about the methodology, feel free to read the article or the report.

▲

andriy_koval a day ago | parent [-]

> There doesn't need to be an admission of guilt to determine that the US acted in violation of international law.

Its not about admission of guilt, but as I said multiple time about material evidence, which is missing in this case.

	▲	text0404 a day ago \| parent [-]
		No it isn't, you just refuse to read the report or any of the other links I've posted. They have a word for what you're doing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning