| ▲ | jmkd 4 hours ago | |
Max Junestrand has consistently said Legora treats the model layer as swappable, selecting across frontier providers rather than building the product around one. OpenAI didn't need to name Legora and Harvey in the second paragraph of the launch post. They are pre-empting the obvious interpretation of Astra for Law: that moving this far up the legal stack puts them in direct competition with their biggest legal AI customers. “Don't worry, they can build on us” is a pretty conspicuous message to include on launch day. They have clearly thought about some pessimistic outcomes. | ||
| ▲ | timpera an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Switching from ChatGPT Enterprise to Legora at my firm was a godsend, it's so much better for legal work, even with the frequent changes to the underlying models. | ||
| ▲ | TZubiri an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
>Max Junestrand has consistently said Legora treats the model layer as swappable, selecting across frontier providers rather than building the product around one. Vendor-neutrality for LLMs is such a weak thesis all around, whether for providers or consumers. It weakens the product by being promiscuous and gains no material benefit at all. LLMs are magic byte(byte) functions, it doesn't make sense to say "we have different providers for magic". | ||