That is an ethics violation. Even in the pre-AI era, getting caught billing for hours not worked was seriously punished.

adzm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"7.5 hours - reviewing output"

	▲	stockresearcher 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, if they actually spent 7.5 hours, and it was a reasonable amount of time. If not, perhaps it would be seen as evidence of incompetence. In the real world, lawyers submit detailed bills and their clients examine them. If you don’t, that’s on you.

epolanski 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How could that be enforced/checked?