| ▲ | baron816 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Those places aren’t isolated though. Many of their residents (and especially their children) have left and found opportunities in other parts of the country. Economists tend to prefer policies that help people, not places. Gary, Indiana just doesn’t have any geographical advantages that make it competitive. I think, if anything, the mistake was to allow people in those places to believe there would be an eventual turnaround by trying to prop up uncompetitive manufacturing industries. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SoftTalker 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary has a port on Lake Michigan, is right next to Chicago and its rail and transit hubs, is well-connected to the interstate highway system, has an airport... it's hard for me to understand how it doesn't have geographical advantages. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | nradov 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary has a huge geographical advantage in being located on the Great Lakes. This really cuts the cost of transport for bulk materials. And it gives them a reliable source of fresh water. It could be a great site for a nuclear power plant. Regardless of how AI economic policy shakes out, we're going to need a lot more electrical power. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | oblio 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary, Indiana. Large parts of Northern England. Large parts of Scotland. Walloonia in Belgium. Northern France. There are LOTS of regions where the people living there have never recovered after deindustrialization. We cannot expect millions of people to just uproot, it's not realistic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | harimau777 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
What about the people who cannot leave? | |||||||||||||||||||||||