| ▲ | 361994752 7 hours ago |
| I had the same problem for a very long time but it is largely solved now. I started to simply ask chatgpt "hey I read something about x, y month ago but can't find it now". There is a surprisingly high chance chatbot can just give the exact answer back to me, usually with extra interesting reading materials as a plus. |
|
| ▲ | cobertos 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Is all your browsing history already with chatgpt or something? This has an MCP server specifically so a workflow like that would work for you. This is just made to gold the data, and I'm a human accessible way should your AI fail you |
| |
| ▲ | 361994752 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | No I don't share anything with chatgpt. But I do have a $20 subscription, if it matters. I feel It's just capable enough to find what I want from my usually vague and inaccurate description. | | |
| ▲ | itsdesmond 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Or something similar enough to what you wanted that you don’t notice it’s a different thing. That’s awful. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | rglullis 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And now you are even more dependent on OpenAI... You didn't solve the problem, you are just trading pain points. |
| |
| ▲ | randomblock1 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nothing about this depends on the provider, you could spin up a local Qwen and give it a search tool like SearXNG or something. At this point local models are more than good enough for simple tasks like that. Using ChatGPT is just (usually) faster and simpler | |
| ▲ | 361994752 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There should be no real vendor lock in in my opinion. You can ask the same question with pi + qwen (or any harness + good enough model) with internet access and it will work. Chatgpt is just one option came in handy. | |
| ▲ | pixl97 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | "Goddammit, I'm wholly dependent on Merriam-Webster, what ever am I going to do". |
|
