Who are these "they" you're talking about?

If your answer is EA or rats then a simple Google search will just show you that it's not true?

tpm 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I'm yet to see evidence they are weighing global warming they way it IMO should be weighted relatively to eg AI risk. I get it, it's not cool.

Compare the number of posts of some EA-adjacent public people talking about AI and talking about this. Or what measure should we choose?

▲

vintermann 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Label them what you want. I'll go with EAs if you insist.

Sure, they're not entirely monolithic. There's room for "EA, but vegan", "EA, but global warming still matters", maybe even "EA, but vaguely socialist". As I keep saying, the core belief is that they're special because of their intellectual superiority, anything else is negotiable.

▲

thevinter 2 days ago | parent [-]

No, what you said what that "They also downplay global warming, nuclear war, wealth inequality" which is just a flat out lie

	▲	vintermann 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Not all of them downplay all of these, but yeah, most of them do. They may have one or two areas of dissent (for EA as a self-identity-building project, do you see why that is to be expected?), but there is a core of beliefs. Yudkowsky's. And he's downplayed all of these.