Note this website appears to be based around the personal theories of a scientist rather than a presentation of the consensus of the field.

Perhaps similar to somebody more famous like Harari in that respect.

The author appears to be legitimate in his scientific background but the repeated implications of the revolutionary nature of his work are somewhat crankish; this is a personal blog so possibly he just needs a good editor (he says he is published elsewhere).

Just something to bear in mind as you read - not that there isn't anything to gain from it; but the boundary between well-grounded theory and speculative philosophic beliefs may not be clear - which to be fair arguably comes somewhat with the territory here.

>between well-grounded theory...

But how is the "dials" that the author describes, which "science" use to make the theory fit the facts of observation, more grounded?

[dead]