| ▲ | snizovtsev 6 hours ago | |||||||
I'm polishing my backup system right now, and found that `tar | zstd | gpg` plus a small vibe-coded wrapper is pretty much all I need. GNU tar has its own incremental index via `--listed-incremental=FILE`. Unlike Borg or Restic, which have their own more complicated repository formats, this leaves me with just one additional file (the `.snar`) alongside a dumb, portable full-disk tar archive. The nice part is that, unlike repositories that require both read/write access patterns, tar can compute deltas using only the small `.snar` file, while the main `full-disk.tar` can remain buried in write-only Glacier storage. This makes it a much better fit for Glacier's write-once model and 180-day minimum retention. My current plan is to upload a full-disk tar to an external HDD + Glacier on a weekly cadence, and the `.snar`-based deltas daily. That gives me a pretty simple cloud backup solution for a few bucks a month (after burning through $100+ of free credits). | ||||||||
| ▲ | nine_k 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
How well did it work for restoring? For me, the ability to mount a backup and look at a particular file proved to be important. Also, I restored from my backups four times; two of them was moving between machines, pretty quickly. | ||||||||
| ▲ | cortesoft 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
The problem with using glacier for backups is it's hard to run restore exercises, and without restore exercises, a backup is pretty dangerous | ||||||||
| ||||||||