| ▲ | fsh a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I would be very surprised if any of the frontier models wasn't trained on all public physics benchmarks. Training data providers have been hiring people for exactly this task. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | letmevoteplease a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This study appears to be evidence against that: the model failed the benchmark but arrived at the correct answer. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bobmarleybiceps a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
yeah, it would be almost shocking if an open source benchmark was NOT used ~somewhere in training. Perhaps just pre-training, but still. Neural networks can be fairly robust to some mistakes in their training data, so maybe it doesn't even matter if some of them are incorrect. Who knows. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | redwood a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I'd have thought the same but this article from yesterday blew my mind https://www.amazon.science/blog/why-dont-machine-learning-re... As it essential implies that these models compress knowledge well in a way that what remains is what's generalizeable more so than remembering every specific detail... Anyway more understanding necessary but thought provoking | |||||||||||||||||||||||