The reaction folks had is OTT, but it does look like AI slop.

One group of folks is trying to say we basically have AGI. The other group is pointing to AI that remains very limited and where lowly humans can spot anything it’s created from a mile away. The evidence continues to point towards the later.

Much like CGI in movies, you only notice bad CGI.

I mean there's a pretty big third group there which recognizes the good parts and the bad parts. Right?

For every person who can spot it a mile away I wonder how many false positives they have or simply aren't aware of it. If you're looking for it, with people using it a lot these days, of course you are going to have a high success rate.

But really I don't think it falls neatly into either of those categories.