| ▲ | calldacopsidc 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This was posted a week ago and I'll just reiterate what I said there.. As an American why should I believe a word of this, when our country's Overton window ranges from "lip service" to "open contempt" for the unemployed? How can I feel confidence for my economic future when, in less than a decade, the frontier AI labs have abandoned any semblance of caution and are embracing a lobby for fewer guardrails? When "move fast, break things" is applied to the "mass cognition replacement machine"? Filing this entire article under "I'll believe it when I fucking see it". The pollyannic nonsense is willfully ignorant and only serves to excuse more concentration of wealth and the mass theft of leverage from the average worker. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wduquette 3 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The point of the article isn't that we will have no need to work; that remains an open question. The body of the article is exploring previous societies or segments of society in which no one needed to have a job, and how they lived their lives, as a way of pondering what a post-work world would look like. It's not particular pollyannic in tone once you get past the opening paragraphs. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||