Makes sense, GLM 5.1/5.2/5.3 is a lot better than DS v4.1, I found the same results in other domains.

Given how fast and cheap DS is, it's just an ideal model with enough "IQ" to let it loose. Another thing they left out of the article, DS becomes really good if you provide custom tools for the task, on it's own it's mediocre.

▲

seemaze 2 hours ago | parent [-]

How does GLM 5.3 Flash rank against it's big brother and the latest Deepseek?

	▲	networked an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Keep in mind that GLM-5.3 isn't GLM-5.3-Flash's "big brother" the way one might think. GLM-5.3-Flash is not GLM-5.3 scaled down. While GLM-5.3 is based on GLM-5.2, and "every gain comes from post-training" (https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3), GLM-5.3-Flash uses a newly trained multimodal base model (https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3-flash).
	▲	mariopt an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Both these models are not bad but you can not trust them to make good decisions. I meant GLM 5.1/5.2/5.3 in the previous answer, not the flash version