Okay, I misunderstood. But it wasn't particularly secret if 'noobs' had access then?

MSFT_Edging 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It sounds like he had already found it the old fashioned way, then the noobs sic'd the LLMs on it, found it, and he told them "hey chill, we knew about this, don't ruin it" and they ruined it.

To quote Dr Ian Malcolm:

"If I may... Um, I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now [bangs on the table]"

	▲	voidnullvalue 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That quote logically implies that people should be paralyzed to act on any novel information. There is no such thing as a discovery that occurs in a vacuum without some prior art. "Standing on the shoulders of giants" Then again, its a silly illogical movie

▲

bothers 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	sva_ 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The vagueposting is off the charts. Whats the point of posting shallow dismissals? If two people independently from you find the same exploit using LLMs, it was clear that it'd leak at some point.