|
| ▲ | tehlike 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You should want higher speed and quality of service from your vendors. In this case, apple is paid wonderfully for it. |
| |
| ▲ | doc_ick 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Apple has some “trust” for vetting things, and with the wave of slop-apps it fine with a slight delay so the App Store doesn’t become riddled with slop like the android store. | | |
| ▲ | tehlike 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Review speed and slopness are related but not exclusive to each other. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jprjr_ 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| let's say you have a bug that makes your app unusable. If you can't get an update our for a week - people are going to just stop using your app. |
| |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | You shouldn't have shipped that bug in the first place, I would say. If the bug comes from an Android update, I assume that developers have had access to betas long before the system update is rolled out. | | |
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | tehlike 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Why do you think apple has point releases that fix... Bugs every time? Not necessarily new features but bugs. Lesson in there. | | |
| ▲ | carlosjobim 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Do you mean that these point releases introduce bugs that break third party software? | | |
| |
| ▲ | tehlike 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | And you know 100% all the bugs are visible at all times. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | cute_boi 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Sometime there are 0 days etc.. So, maybe you should have broader view on things instead of simple assumption. |
