| ▲ | hungryhobbit 9 hours ago | |
I'm going to be a contrarian and point out that a digital meter should be better than a dipstick. With the dipstick you need to: * grab a napkin (or similar paper) * open the hood of your car * pull the dipstick out, wipe it off, put it back in, pull it back out * you then have (imprecisely) measure the oil level * your hands get dirty through all this * finally you can shut your hood and throw your napkin off (after maybe wiping your hands off with it) That sucks! A digital version is better ... or at least it should be. The problem here is the car companies. They take what should be a clear win (like this) and ruin it ... just like I'm sure they'll ruin this. You will need to pay $50/month to access your own oil gauge, it will break and cost hundreds of dollars to repair, the company will do what GM is doing and not also offer a regular old dipstick, etc. Fuck Detroit! Lets get those Chinese cars (OR SOME KIND OF COMPETITION) into America! | ||
| ▲ | stockresearcher 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |
It’s mildly contrarian, I suppose. But dipstick-less engines have been around for 20+ years and there’s no evidence that they are problematic. | ||