Is it easy? What if an organization avoids liability through shell companies and financial engineering?

"The company managing your warranty was acquired by Foobar Inc and their sole building burned down destroying all records. We apologize for the inconvenience."

▲

Dylan16807 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well there is the option to make Amazon responsible for what they sell...

▲

MrDrMcCoy 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

I think they should be responsible for accurate listings, swift refunds, taking down misleading products, and banning repeat offenders. I somehow think making Amazon "responsible for what they sell" goes far beyond that in ways that are not reasonable. Only those that make products should be responsible for them.

	▲	Dylan16807 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Well they don't ban repeat offenders. Trying to directly regulate the banning of repeat offenders seems more difficult and less fruitful than giving the store fallback responsibility for the warranty. Australia gives the store primary responsibility and it seems to work well for them.

▲

pydry 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Demand collateral

▲

Animats 4 hours ago | parent [-]

That's what bonds are for. US customs requires prepaid bonds for other things. Importers who don't have enough assets would have to post a bond to cover repairs for the product. They get it back at 10 years.

	▲	pasc1878 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		A way to get the right to repair for the rest of the world. Apple/MS/Google would have to keep their products working for 10 years.

▲

Joel_Mckay 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

When most fortune 500 companies burned brand-goodwill to sell disposable versions of products, it is credulous to believe all problems are external. =3